You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of Dyslipidemia in Urban and Rural India: The ICMR–INDIAB Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0096808 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shashank R. Joshi, Ranjit Mohan Anjana, Mohan Deepa, Rajendra Pradeepa, Anil Bhansali, Vinay K. Dhandania, Prashant P. Joshi, Ranjit Unnikrishnan, Elangovan Nirmal, Radhakrishnan Subashini, Sri Venkata Madhu, Paturi Vishnupriya Rao, Ashok Kumar Das, Tanvir Kaur, Deepak Kumar Shukla, Viswanathan Mohan, for the ICMR– INDIAB Collaborative Study Group |
| Abstract |
To study the pattern and prevalence of dyslipidemia in a large representative sample of four selected regions in India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 33% |
| Oman | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 328 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 9% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 19% |
| Unknown | 113 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 122 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,926,266
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,415
of 201,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,434
of 228,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,038
of 4,723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.