You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Thermal insulation for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009908.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phil Alderson, Gillian Campbell, Andrew F Smith, Sheryl Warttig, Amanda Nicholson, Sharon R Lewis |
Abstract |
Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia occurs because of interference with normal temperature regulation by anaesthetic drugs and exposure of skin for prolonged periods. A number of different interventions have been proposed to maintain body temperature by reducing heat loss. Thermal insulation, such as extra layers of insulating material or reflective blankets, should reduce heat loss through convection and radiation and potentially help avoid hypothermia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Spain | 2 | 17% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 199 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
Other | 48 | 24% |
Unknown | 50 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 17% |
Psychology | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 59 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,962,420
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,229
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,035
of 242,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.