↓ Skip to main content

A Model for Creating a Supportive Trauma-Informed Culture for Children in Preschool Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child and Family Studies, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Model for Creating a Supportive Trauma-Informed Culture for Children in Preschool Settings
Published in
Journal of Child and Family Studies, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10826-014-9968-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl Holmes, Michelle Levy, Avis Smith, Susan Pinne, Paula Neese

Abstract

The all too common exposure of young children to traumatic situations and the life-long consequences that can result underscore the need for effective, developmentally appropriate interventions that address complex trauma. This paper describes Head Start Trauma Smart (HSTS), an early education/mental health cross-systems partnership designed to work within the child's natural setting-in this case, Head Start classrooms. The goal of HSTS is to decrease the stress of chronic trauma, foster age-appropriate social and cognitive development, and create an integrated, trauma-informed culture for young children, parents, and staff. Created from a community perspective, the HSTS program emphasizes tools and skills that can be applied in everyday settings, thereby providing resources to address current and future trauma. Program evaluation findings indicate preliminary support for both the need for identification and intervention and the potential to positively impact key outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 366 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 11%
Researcher 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 92 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 112 30%
Social Sciences 86 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Arts and Humanities 12 3%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 103 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,668,174
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#126
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,086
of 240,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.