↓ Skip to main content

A test of the compensatory mortality hypothesis in mountain lions: A management experiment in West‐Central Montana

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A test of the compensatory mortality hypothesis in mountain lions: A management experiment in West‐Central Montana
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.726
Authors

Hugh S. Robinson, Richard Desimone, Cynthia Hartway, Justin A. Gude, Michael J. Thompson, Michael S. Mitchell, Mark Hebblewhite

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 47%
Environmental Science 23 17%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,063,443
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#834
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,204
of 232,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.