↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomics of the Water Column in the Pristine Upper Course of the Amazon River

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metagenomics of the Water Column in the Pristine Upper Course of the Amazon River
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rohit Ghai, Francisco Rodŕíguez-Valera, Katherine D. McMahon, Danyelle Toyama, Raquel Rinke, Tereza Cristina Souza de Oliveira, José Wagner Garcia, Fernando Pellon de Miranda, Flavio Henrique-Silva

Abstract

River water is a small percentage of the total freshwater on Earth but represents an essential resource for mankind. Microbes in rivers perform essential ecosystem roles including the mineralization of significant quantities of organic matter originating from terrestrial habitats. The Amazon river in particular is famous for its size and importance in the mobilization of both water and carbon out of its enormous basin. Here we present the first metagenomic study on the microbiota of this river. It presents many features in common with the other freshwater metagenome available (Lake Gatun in Panama) and much less similarity with marine samples. Among the microbial taxa found, the cosmopolitan freshwater acI lineage of the actinobacteria was clearly dominant. Group I Crenarchaea and the freshwater sister group of the marine SAR11 clade, LD12, were found alongside more exclusive and well known freshwater taxa such as Polynucleobacter. A metabolism-centric analysis revealed a disproportionate representation of pathways involved in heterotrophic carbon processing, as compared to those found in marine samples. In particular, these river microbes appear to be specialized in taking up and mineralizing allochthonous carbon derived from plant material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 5 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 357 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 21%
Researcher 67 18%
Student > Master 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 10%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 16%
Environmental Science 38 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 60 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,842,899
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,870
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,459
of 123,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#755
of 2,442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.