↓ Skip to main content

Inaugural bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: a specific prognostic entity?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inaugural bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: a specific prognostic entity?
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mélanie Deberne, Stanislas Ropert, Bertrand Billemont, Catherine Daniel, Jeanne Chapron, François Goldwasser

Abstract

In non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), median survival from the time patients develop bone metastasis is classically described being inferior to 6 months. We investigated the subcategory of patients having an inaugural skeletal-related-event revealing NSCLC. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of bone involvement on overall survival and to determine biological and tumoral prognosis factors on OS and PFS. An analysis of the subgroup of solitary bone metastasis patients was also performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Psychology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,405,869
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,632
of 8,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,295
of 229,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#32
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.