You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of Strict vs. Multiple Use Protected Areas in Reducing Tropical Forest Fires: A Global Analysis Using Matching Methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022722 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Nelson, Kenneth M. Chomitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Peru | 1 | 9% |
Brazil | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
Germany | 5 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 12 | 2% |
Unknown | 723 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 152 | 20% |
Student > Master | 143 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 129 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 65 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
Other | 120 | 16% |
Unknown | 116 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 286 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 47 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 29 | 4% |
Other | 49 | 6% |
Unknown | 150 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#511,287
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,032
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,723
of 124,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#75
of 2,422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.