↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Strict vs. Multiple Use Protected Areas in Reducing Tropical Forest Fires: A Global Analysis Using Matching Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
364 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
766 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Strict vs. Multiple Use Protected Areas in Reducing Tropical Forest Fires: A Global Analysis Using Matching Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022722
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Nelson, Kenneth M. Chomitz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 723 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 152 20%
Student > Master 143 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 17%
Student > Bachelor 65 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 120 16%
Unknown 116 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 286 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 22%
Social Sciences 47 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 4%
Other 49 6%
Unknown 150 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#511,287
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,032
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,723
of 124,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#75
of 2,422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.