↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions for erectile dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions for erectile dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Melnik, Bernardo Soares, Antônia Gladys Nasello

Abstract

Normal sexual function is a biopsychosocial process and relies on the coordination of psychological, endocrine, vascular, and neurological factors. Recent data show that psychological factors are involved in a substantial number of cases of erectile dysfunction (ED) alone or in combination with organic causes. However, in contrast to the advances in somatic research of erectile dysfunction, scientific literature shows contradictory reports on the results of psychotherapy for the treatment of ED.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 45%
Psychology 16 21%
Unspecified 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Other 4 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2011.
All research outputs
#7,860,056
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,561
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,310
of 89,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.