↓ Skip to main content

Debriefing for technology‐enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Education, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Debriefing for technology‐enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Medical Education, June 2014
DOI 10.1111/medu.12432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Cheng, Walter Eppich, Vincent Grant, Jonathan Sherbino, Benjamin Zendejas, David A Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 454 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Other 46 10%
Researcher 46 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 7%
Other 134 29%
Unknown 89 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 183 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 16%
Social Sciences 29 6%
Psychology 19 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 1%
Other 42 9%
Unknown 113 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,581,028
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#196
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,234
of 247,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.