↓ Skip to main content

The role of geographical proximity for project performance: evidence from the German Leading-Edge Cluster Competition

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Technology Transfer, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of geographical proximity for project performance: evidence from the German Leading-Edge Cluster Competition
Published in
The Journal of Technology Transfer, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10961-017-9600-1
Authors

Susanne Hinzmann, Uwe Cantner, Holger Graf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 15 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 11%
Engineering 4 7%
Computer Science 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#13,876,200
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#349
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,543
of 312,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.