You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Respiratory Rate Measurements in Children Using Mobile Devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0099266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter Karlen, Heng Gan, Michelle Chiu, Dustin Dunsmuir, Guohai Zhou, Guy A. Dumont, J. Mark Ansermino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Armenia | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 33 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 23% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#421,573
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,914
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,570
of 247,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#123
of 4,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.