↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy and en-mass splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy and en-mass splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5801-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Chet Toh, Jaideepraj Rao

Abstract

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopy surgery in locally Advanced Gastric Cancers (AGC) have not been proven by randomized control trials. Therefore, standard of care for AGC is still open surgery. Here, we are presenting a 64-year-old female with proximal gastric adenocarcinoma (close to cardio-oesophageal junction) adherent to tail of pancreas, who underwent D2 total gastrectomy en-mass distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Five ports are entered into the peritoneal cavity (Three 10-12 mm and two 5 mm ports). Another 5 mm stab incision is made in the epigastrium for Nathanson Liver retractor. Standard D2 Gastrectomy was performed with en-mass removal of the spleen and body and tail of the pancreas. Roux-en-Y oesophago-jejunostomy (Hand sewn) and Jejuno-Jejunostomy reconstruction were performed laparoscopically. Hereby, we present a video of the above procedure. Total Operating time was 235 min. Post-operatively the patient was able to mobilize independently. Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) was started and continued until post-operative day (POD) 7 once gastrografin test and blue dye test both showed no anastomotic leak. Patient started on oral feeding and was discharged home well on POD 9. Histology showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with pT3N3b (17 nodes out of 62 positive). Although laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy and en-mass distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy are feasible and safe in advanced gastric carcinoma, its oncological value has yet to be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,648,031
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#989
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,386
of 316,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#35
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.