↓ Skip to main content

Epidemic Levels of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR and XDR-TB) in a High HIV Prevalence Setting in Khayelitsha, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemic Levels of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR and XDR-TB) in a High HIV Prevalence Setting in Khayelitsha, South Africa
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013901
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen S. Cox, Cheryl McDermid, Virginia Azevedo, Odelia Muller, David Coetzee, John Simpson, Marinus Barnard, Gerrit Coetzee, Gilles van Cutsem, Eric Goemaere

Abstract

Although multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is emerging as a significant threat to tuberculosis control in high HIV prevalence countries such as South Africa, limited data is available on the burden of drug resistant tuberculosis and any association with HIV in such settings. We conducted a community-based representative survey to assess the MDR-TB burden in Khayelitsha, an urban township in South Africa with high HIV and TB prevalence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 261 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 11%
Other 18 7%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 53 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,777,064
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,521
of 194,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,956
of 99,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#311
of 1,008 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,008 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.