You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The incredible years therapeutic dinosaur programme to build social and emotional competence in welsh primary schools: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracey Bywater, Judy Hutchings, Christopher Whitaker, Ceri Evans, Laura Parry |
| Abstract |
School interventions such as the Incredible Years Classroom Dinosaur Programme targets pupil behaviour across whole classrooms, yet for some children a more intense approach is needed. The Incredible Years Therapeutic Dinosaur Programme is effective for clinically referred children by enhancing social, problem-solving skills, and peer relationship-building skills when delivered in a clinical setting in small groups. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Therapeutic Programme, delivered with small groups of children at high-risk of developing conduct disorder, delivered in schools already implementing the Classroom Programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 16% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2014.
All research outputs
#21,155,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#26
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,086
of 198,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.