↓ Skip to main content

How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renate AMM Kieft, Brigitte BJM de Brouwer, Anneke L Francke, Diana MJ Delnoij

Abstract

Healthcare organisations monitor patient experiences in order to evaluate and improve the quality of care. Because nurses spend a lot of time with patients, they have a major impact on patient experiences. To improve patient experiences of the quality of care, nurses need to know what factors within the nursing work environment are of influence. The main focus of this research was to comprehend the views of Dutch nurses on how their work and their work environment contribute to positive patient experiences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 328 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 26%
Student > Bachelor 72 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Unspecified 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 91 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 135 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 23%
Unspecified 40 12%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 5%
Other 49 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#565,919
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#166
of 4,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,030
of 157,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.