↓ Skip to main content

How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renate AMM Kieft, Brigitte BJM de Brouwer, Anneke L Francke, Diana MJ Delnoij

Abstract

Healthcare organisations monitor patient experiences in order to evaluate and improve the quality of care. Because nurses spend a lot of time with patients, they have a major impact on patient experiences. To improve patient experiences of the quality of care, nurses need to know what factors within the nursing work environment are of influence. The main focus of this research was to comprehend the views of Dutch nurses on how their work and their work environment contribute to positive patient experiences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Unknown 376 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 26%
Student > Bachelor 90 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 76 20%
Unknown 35 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 159 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 21%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 5%
Psychology 14 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 46 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#601,770
of 13,612,359 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#175
of 4,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,082
of 155,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.