↓ Skip to main content

Rosaceous Chamaebatiaria-Like Foliage from the Paleogene of Western North America

Overview of attention for article published in Aliso, January 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rosaceous Chamaebatiaria-Like Foliage from the Paleogene of Western North America
Published in
Aliso, January 1988
DOI 10.5642/aliso.19881201.14
Authors

Jack Wolfe, Wesley Wehr

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 10%
United States 1 10%
Italy 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Computer Science 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,326,359
of 11,771,127 outputs
Outputs from Aliso
#452
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,032
of 264,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aliso
#46
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,771,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.