↓ Skip to main content

Sistema Gerenciador de Ambiente Laboratorial - GAL: Avaliação de uma ferramenta para a vigilância sentinela de síndrome gripal, Brasil, 2011-2012*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sistema Gerenciador de Ambiente Laboratorial - GAL: Avaliação de uma ferramenta para a vigilância sentinela de síndrome gripal, Brasil, 2011-2012*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000200011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco José de Paula, Alex Sander Duarte da Matta, Ronaldo de Jesus, Roberta Paim Guimarães, Líbia Roberta de Oliveira Souza, Jonas Lotufo Brant, Francisco José de Paula, Alex Sander Duarte da Matta, Ronaldo de Jesus, Roberta Paim Guimarães, Líbia Roberta de Oliveira Souza, Jonas Lotufo Brant

Abstract

to evaluate the Brazilian Laboratorial Environment Management System (GAL) as a data source for the Sentinel Surveillance of Influenza-Like Illness (SSILI). this is an evaluation study of GAL, through the analysis of its simplicity, flexibility, data quality, acceptability, representativeness, timeliness, stability and usefulness for SSILI, based on the guide for system evaluation in public health of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta/GA, USA). in 2011 and 2012, a total of 13,765 exams for respiratory viruses were registered. GAL presented simple structure, flexibility to changes, good data quality, acceptability and timeliness in the access to test results, being representative and stable in 23 Brazilian states. the system is useful in meeting the goals of SSILI; however, there are some recommendations for adjustments and for encouraging the adherence by the states that do not use the system yet.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 14 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#12,437,598
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#136
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,469
of 273,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.