You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two Major Medicinal Honeys Have Different Mechanisms of Bactericidal Activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulus H. S. Kwakman, Anje A. te Velde, Leonie de Boer, Christina M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Sebastian A. J. Zaat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Oman | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 7% |
| Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,028,527
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,174
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,695
of 125,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#83
of 1,464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.