↓ Skip to main content

Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
200 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002281.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, Deery C, Walmsley AD, Robinson PG, Glenny AM, Munirah Yaacob, Helen V Worthington, Scott A Deacon, Chris Deery, A Damien Walmsley, Peter G Robinson, Anne-Marie Glenny, Yaacob, Munirah, Worthington, Helen V, Deacon, Scott A, Deery, Chris, Walmsley, A Damien, Robinson, Peter G, Glenny, Anne-Marie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 24%
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Student > Postgraduate 24 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 78%
Unspecified 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 6 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 277. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#24,839
of 8,625,247 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 8,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#535
of 179,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,625,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.