↓ Skip to main content

Reduction of delayed onset muscle soreness by a novel curcumin delivery system (Meriva®): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
29 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduction of delayed onset muscle soreness by a novel curcumin delivery system (Meriva®): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-11-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franchek Drobnic, Joan Riera, Giovanni Appendino, Stefano Togni, Federico Franceschi, Xavier Valle, Antoni Pons, Josep Tur

Abstract

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) due to eccentric muscle activity is associated with inflammatory responses and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that sustain both inflammation and oxidative stress. Curcumin, a powerful promoter of anti-oxidant response, is one of the best-investigated natural products, and is now commercially available as a lecithin delivery system (Meriva®, Indena SpA, Milan) with improved bio-availability. The aim of this study was to test whether curcumin could attenuate damage from oxidative stress and inflammation related to acute muscle injury induced by eccentric continuous exercise.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 23%
Student > Master 26 19%
Other 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 24%
Sports and Recreations 26 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 20 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#159,455
of 14,070,698 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#69
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,338
of 189,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,070,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them