↓ Skip to main content

Vitamins C and E for asthma and exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamins C and E for asthma and exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010749.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Wilkinson, Anna Hart, Stephen J Milan, Karnam Sugumar

Abstract

The association between dietary antioxidants and asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is not fully understood. Vitamin C and vitamin E are natural antioxidants that are predominantly present in fruits and vegetables; inadequate vitamin E intake is associated with airway inflammation. It has been postulated that the combination may be more beneficial than either single antioxidant for people with asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 304 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 106 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Sports and Recreations 14 5%
Psychology 12 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 121 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,236,093
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,304
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,036
of 242,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#158
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.