↓ Skip to main content

Sentinel Surveillance of Influenza-Like-Illness in Two Cities of the Tropical Country of Ecuador: 2006–2010

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sentinel Surveillance of Influenza-Like-Illness in Two Cities of the Tropical Country of Ecuador: 2006–2010
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard W. Douce, Washington Aleman, Wilson Chicaiza-Ayala, Cesar Madrid, Merly Sovero, Franklin Delgado, Mireya Rodas, Julia Ampuero, Gloria Chauca, Juan Perez, Josefina Garcia, Tadeusz Kochel, Eric S. Halsey, V. Alberto Laguna-Torres

Abstract

Tropical countries are thought to play an important role in the global behavior of respiratory infections such as influenza. The tropical country of Ecuador has almost no documentation of the causes of acute respiratory infections. The objectives of this study were to identify the viral agents associated with influenza like illness (ILI) in Ecuador, describe what strains of influenza were circulating in the region along with their epidemiologic characteristics, and perform molecular characterization of those strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 3 4%
Madagascar 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 68 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 22%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Mathematics 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2011.
All research outputs
#16,233,433
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,771
of 223,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,268
of 135,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,492
of 2,493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.