You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fast Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve Based Upon Steady-State Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Results From the VIRTU-Fast Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.04.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul D. Morris, Daniel Alejandro Silva Soto, Jeroen F.A. Feher, Dan Rafiroiu, Angela Lungu, Susheel Varma, Patricia V. Lawford, D. Rodney Hose, Julian P. Gunn |
| Abstract |
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous intervention is superior to standard assessment but remains underused. The authors have developed a novel "pseudotransient" analysis protocol for computing virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) based upon angiographic images and steady-state computational fluid dynamics. This protocol generates vFFR results in 189 s (cf >24 h for transient analysis) using a desktop PC, with <1% error relative to that of full-transient computational fluid dynamics analysis. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that physiological lesion significance was influenced less by coronary or lesion anatomy (33%) and more by microvascular physiology (59%). If coronary microvascular resistance can be estimated, vFFR can be accurately computed in less time than it takes to make invasive measurements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 15% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 26 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,967,205
of 25,967,142 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#167
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,492
of 328,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.