↓ Skip to main content

Neurological Assessment and Its Relationship to CSF Biomarkers in Amateur Boxers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurological Assessment and Its Relationship to CSF Biomarkers in Amateur Boxers
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0099870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanna Neselius, Helena Brisby, Jan Marcusson, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Thomas Karlsson

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussion is common in many sports. Today, neuropsychological evaluation is recommended in the monitoring of a concussion and in return-to-play considerations. To investigate the sensitivity of neuropsychological assessment, we tested amateur boxers post bout and compared with controls. Further the relationship between neuropsychological test results and brain injury biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Psychology 20 14%
Sports and Recreations 17 12%
Neuroscience 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#911,264
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,007
of 214,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,785
of 233,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#275
of 4,459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.