↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 246)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajesh Puranik, Belinda Gray, Helen Lackey, Laura Yeates, Geoffrey Parker, Johan Duflou, Christopher Semsarian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 26 29%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,269,287
of 25,386,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#40
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,117
of 237,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.