↓ Skip to main content

Thinking in circuits: toward neurobiological explanation in cognitive neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 686)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thinking in circuits: toward neurobiological explanation in cognitive neuroscience
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00422-014-0603-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Friedemann Pulvermüller, Max Garagnani, Thomas Wennekers

Abstract

Cognitive theory has decomposed human mental abilities into cognitive (sub) systems, and cognitive neuroscience succeeded in disclosing a host of relationships between cognitive systems and specific structures of the human brain. However, an explanation of why specific functions are located in specific brain loci had still been missing, along with a neurobiological model that makes concrete the neuronal circuits that carry thoughts and meaning. Brain theory, in particular the Hebb-inspired neurocybernetic proposals by Braitenberg, now offers an avenue toward explaining brain-mind relationships and to spell out cognition in terms of neuron circuits in a neuromechanistic sense. Central to this endeavor is the theoretical construct of an elementary functional neuronal unit above the level of individual neurons and below that of whole brain areas and systems: the distributed neuronal assembly (DNA) or thought circuit (TC). It is shown that DNA/TC theory of cognition offers an integrated explanatory perspective on brain mechanisms of perception, action, language, attention, memory, decision and conceptual thought. We argue that DNAs carry all of these functions and that their inner structure (e.g., core and halo subcomponents), and their functional activation dynamics (e.g., ignition and reverberation processes) answer crucial localist questions, such as why memory and decisions draw on prefrontal areas although memory formation is normally driven by information in the senses and in the motor system. We suggest that the ability of building DNAs/TCs spread out over different cortical areas is the key mechanism for a range of specifically human sensorimotor, linguistic and conceptual capacities and that the cell assembly mechanism of overlap reduction is crucial for differentiating a vocabulary of actions, symbols and concepts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 211 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 16%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Professor 9 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 17%
Neuroscience 37 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Computer Science 14 6%
Linguistics 11 5%
Other 52 24%
Unknown 56 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,642,172
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#11
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,930
of 246,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them