↓ Skip to main content

Effective Stimuli for Constructing Reliable Neuron Models

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective Stimuli for Constructing Reliable Neuron Models
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaul Druckmann, Thomas K. Berger, Felix Schürmann, Sean Hill, Henry Markram, Idan Segev

Abstract

The rich dynamical nature of neurons poses major conceptual and technical challenges for unraveling their nonlinear membrane properties. Traditionally, various current waveforms have been injected at the soma to probe neuron dynamics, but the rationale for selecting specific stimuli has never been rigorously justified. The present experimental and theoretical study proposes a novel framework, inspired by learning theory, for objectively selecting the stimuli that best unravel the neuron's dynamics. The efficacy of stimuli is assessed in terms of their ability to constrain the parameter space of biophysically detailed conductance-based models that faithfully replicate the neuron's dynamics as attested by their ability to generalize well to the neuron's response to novel experimental stimuli. We used this framework to evaluate a variety of stimuli in different types of cortical neurons, ages and animals. Despite their simplicity, a set of stimuli consisting of step and ramp current pulses outperforms synaptic-like noisy stimuli in revealing the dynamics of these neurons. The general framework that we propose paves a new way for defining, evaluating and standardizing effective electrical probing of neurons and will thus lay the foundation for a much deeper understanding of the electrical nature of these highly sophisticated and non-linear devices and of the neuronal networks that they compose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
United States 4 3%
Germany 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 130 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Master 18 12%
Professor 13 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 31%
Neuroscience 36 24%
Computer Science 16 10%
Physics and Astronomy 10 7%
Engineering 10 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 17 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,995
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,811
of 133,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.