You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
FoxO and Stress Responses in the Cnidarian Hydra vulgaris
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011686 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane Bridge, Alexander G. Theofiles, Rebecca L. Holler, Emily Marcinkevicius, Robert E. Steele, Daniel E. Martínez |
| Abstract |
In the face of changing environmental conditions, the mechanisms underlying stress responses in diverse organisms are of increasing interest. In vertebrates, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans, FoxO transcription factors mediate cellular responses to stress, including oxidative stress and dietary restriction. Although FoxO genes have been identified in early-arising animal lineages including sponges and cnidarians, little is known about their roles in these organisms. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
| Researcher | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2010.
All research outputs
#20,145,561
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,528
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,721
of 94,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#719
of 748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.