↓ Skip to main content

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010211.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Tieu, Emily Shepherd, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 26%
Unspecified 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 44%
Unspecified 32 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 15 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,272,262
of 12,802,184 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,203
of 10,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,241
of 263,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,802,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.