You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neanderthal Use of Fish, Mammals, Birds, Starchy Plants and Wood 125-250,000 Years Ago
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023768 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce L. Hardy, Marie-Hélène Moncel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 26% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 87% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Portugal | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 21% |
| Researcher | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 99 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#377,207
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,351
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,320
of 138,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 2,511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.