↓ Skip to main content

Engineered silica nanoparticles act as adjuvants to enhance allergic airway disease in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineered silica nanoparticles act as adjuvants to enhance allergic airway disease in mice
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-10-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Brandenberger, Nicole L Rowley, Daven N Jackson-Humbles, Quanxuan Zhang, Lori A Bramble, Ryan P Lewandowski, James G Wagner, Weimin Chen, Barbara L Kaplan, Norbert E Kaminski, Gregory L Baker, Robert M Worden, Jack R Harkema

Abstract

With the increase in production and use of engineered nanoparticles (NP; <= 100 nm), safety concerns have risen about the potential health effects of occupational or environmental NP exposure. Results of animal toxicology studies suggest that inhalation of NP may cause pulmonary injury with subsequent acute or chronic inflammation. People with chronic respiratory diseases like asthma or allergic rhinitis may be even more susceptible to toxic effects of inhaled NP. Few studies, however, have investigated adverse effects of inhaled NP that may enhance the development of allergic airway disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Chemistry 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,189,133
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#108
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,427
of 194,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.