You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Speech and language therapy to improve the communication skills of children with cerebral palsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003466.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay Pennington, Juliet Goldbart, Julie Marshall |
| Abstract |
The production of speech, language and gesture for communication is often affected by cerebral palsy. Communication difficulties associated with cerebral palsy can be multifactorial, arising from motor, intellectual and / or sensory impairments, and children with this diagnosis can experience mild to severe difficulties in expressing themselves. They are often referred to speech and language therapy (SLT) services, to maximise their communication skills and help them to take an independent a role as possible in interaction. This can include introducing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, such as symbol charts or speech synthesizers, as well treating children's natural forms of communication. Various strategies have been used to treat the communication disorders associated with cerebral palsy but evidence of their effectiveness is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 485 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 9% |
| Researcher | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 18% |
| Unknown | 136 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 78 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 8% |
| Psychology | 38 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 78 | 16% |
| Unknown | 153 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,280,385
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,558
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,999
of 62,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.