↓ Skip to main content

Speech and language therapy to improve the communication skills of children with cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Speech and language therapy to improve the communication skills of children with cerebral palsy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003466.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay Pennington, Juliet Goldbart, Julie Marshall

Abstract

The production of speech, language and gesture for communication is often affected by cerebral palsy. Communication difficulties associated with cerebral palsy can be multifactorial, arising from motor, intellectual and / or sensory impairments, and children with this diagnosis can experience mild to severe difficulties in expressing themselves. They are often referred to speech and language therapy (SLT) services, to maximise their communication skills and help them to take an independent a role as possible in interaction. This can include introducing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, such as symbol charts or speech synthesizers, as well treating children's natural forms of communication. Various strategies have been used to treat the communication disorders associated with cerebral palsy but evidence of their effectiveness is limited.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 287 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 25%
Student > Bachelor 44 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 18%
Psychology 29 10%
Social Sciences 29 10%
Linguistics 12 4%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 55 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,021,463
of 13,849,741 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,714
of 10,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,952
of 187,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,849,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.