↓ Skip to main content

Biomedical Cloud Computing With Amazon Web Services

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 X users
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
26 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomedical Cloud Computing With Amazon Web Services
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent A. Fusaro, Prasad Patil, Erik Gafni, Dennis P. Wall, Peter J. Tonellato

Abstract

In this overview to biomedical computing in the cloud, we discussed two primary ways to use the cloud (a single instance or cluster), provided a detailed example using NGS mapping, and highlighted the associated costs. While many users new to the cloud may assume that entry is as straightforward as uploading an application and selecting an instance type and storage options, we illustrated that there is substantial up-front effort required before an application can make full use of the cloud's vast resources. Our intention was to provide a set of best practices and to illustrate how those apply to a typical application pipeline for biomedical informatics, but also general enough for extrapolation to other types of computational problems. Our mapping example was intended to illustrate how to develop a scalable project and not to compare and contrast alignment algorithms for read mapping and genome assembly. Indeed, with a newer aligner such as Bowtie, it is possible to map the entire African genome using one m2.2xlarge instance in 48 hours for a total cost of approximately $48 in computation time. In our example, we were not concerned with data transfer rates, which are heavily influenced by the amount of available bandwidth, connection latency, and network availability. When transferring large amounts of data to the cloud, bandwidth limitations can be a major bottleneck, and in some cases it is more efficient to simply mail a storage device containing the data to AWS (http://aws.amazon.com/importexport/). More information about cloud computing, detailed cost analysis, and security can be found in references.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 6%
United Kingdom 11 3%
Germany 6 2%
Brazil 5 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 306 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 113 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 16%
Student > Master 41 11%
Other 23 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 6%
Other 86 23%
Unknown 30 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 35%
Computer Science 88 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Engineering 16 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 38 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#893,870
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#671
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,539
of 134,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.