You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of longitudinally dynamic biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid by targeted proteomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Neurodegeneration, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1326-9-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin R Wildsmith, Stephen P Schauer, Ashley M Smith, David Arnott, Yuda Zhu, Joshua Haznedar, Surinder Kaur, W Rodney Mathews, Lee A Honigberg |
| Abstract |
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia affecting greater than 26 million people worldwide. Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ42, tau, and p-tau181 are well established as diagnostic biomarkers of AD, there is a need for additional CSF biomarkers of neuronal function that continue to change during disease progression and could be used as pharmacodynamic measures in clinical trials. Multiple proteomic discovery experiments have reported a range of CSF biomarkers that differ between AD and control subjects. These potential biomarkers represent multiple aspects of the disease pathology. The performance of these markers has not been compared with each other, and their performance has not been evaluated longitudinally. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Portugal | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#673
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,613
of 242,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.