↓ Skip to main content

Drug Delivery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Nanoparticle technologies for cancer therapy.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 687)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nanoparticle technologies for cancer therapy.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Drug Delivery
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00477-3_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-200476-6, 978-3-64-200477-3
Authors

Alexis F, Pridgen EM, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Alexis, Frank, Pridgen, Eric M., Langer, Robert, Farokhzad, Omid C., Frank Alexis, Eric M. Pridgen, Robert Langer, Omid C. Farokhzad

Editors

Monika Schäfer-Korting

Abstract

Nanoparticles as drug delivery systems enable unique approaches for cancer treatment. Over the last two decades, a large number of nanoparticle delivery systems have been developed for cancer therapy, including organic and inorganic materials. Many liposomal, polymer-drug conjugates, and micellar formulations are part of the state of the art in the clinics, and an even greater number of nanoparticle platforms are currently in the preclinical stages of development. More recently developed nanoparticles are demonstrating the potential sophistication of these delivery systems by incorporating multifunctional capabilities and targeting strategies in an effort to increase the efficacy of these systems against the most difficult cancer challenges, including drug resistance and metastatic disease. In this chapter, we will review the available preclinical and clinical nanoparticle technology platforms and their impact for cancer therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 322 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 29%
Student > Master 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Researcher 35 10%
Other 13 4%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 52 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 20%
Chemistry 46 14%
Engineering 35 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 8%
Other 73 22%
Unknown 61 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,122,889
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#39
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,141
of 178,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.