↓ Skip to main content

Meraculous: De Novo Genome Assembly with Short Paired-End Reads

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meraculous: De Novo Genome Assembly with Short Paired-End Reads
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jarrod A. Chapman, Isaac Ho, Sirisha Sunkara, Shujun Luo, Gary P. Schroth, Daniel S. Rokhsar

Abstract

We describe a new algorithm, meraculous, for whole genome assembly of deep paired-end short reads, and apply it to the assembly of a dataset of paired 75-bp Illumina reads derived from the 15.4 megabase genome of the haploid yeast Pichia stipitis. More than 95% of the genome is recovered, with no errors; half the assembled sequence is in contigs longer than 101 kilobases and in scaffolds longer than 269 kilobases. Incorporating fosmid ends recovers entire chromosomes. Meraculous relies on an efficient and conservative traversal of the subgraph of the k-mer (deBruijn) graph of oligonucleotides with unique high quality extensions in the dataset, avoiding an explicit error correction step as used in other short-read assemblers. A novel memory-efficient hashing scheme is introduced. The resulting contigs are ordered and oriented using paired reads separated by ∼280 bp or ∼3.2 kbp, and many gaps between contigs can be closed using paired-end placements. Practical issues with the dataset are described, and prospects for assembling larger genomes are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Brazil 7 2%
Norway 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 288 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 23%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 17%
Computer Science 39 12%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 42 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,272,202
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,623
of 201,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,127
of 124,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#317
of 2,389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.