↓ Skip to main content

Food Security and Nutrition Interventions in Response to the Aids Epidemic: Assessing Global Action and Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food Security and Nutrition Interventions in Response to the Aids Epidemic: Assessing Global Action and Evidence
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0822-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noora-Lisa Aberman, Rahul Rawat, Scott Drimie, Joan M. Claros, Suneetha Kadiyala

Abstract

The number of people receiving antiretroviral therapy in developing countries has increased dramatically. The last decade has brought an increased understanding of the interconnectedness between HIV/AIDS, food insecurity, and undernutrition and a surge of evidence on how to address the food security and nutrition dimensions of the epidemic. We review this evidence as well as the corresponding evolution of policy support for incorporating food security and nutrition concerns into HIV programming. The available evidence, although varied in scope and methodologies, shows that nutrition supplementation and safety nets in the form of food assistance and livelihood interventions have potential in certain contexts to improve food security and nutrition outcomes in an HIV/AIDS context. In the face of funding uncertainties and competing priorities, we must maintain momentum towards effective and sustainable solutions to the epidemic through continued systematic research to inform policy and through the strengthening of monitoring systems to dynamically inform intervention development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 24%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 36 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Social Sciences 27 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 44 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,242,747
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,625
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,883
of 230,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#35
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.