↓ Skip to main content

Why It’s Inappropriate Not to Treat Incarcerated Patients with Opioid Agonist Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
90 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why It’s Inappropriate Not to Treat Incarcerated Patients with Opioid Agonist Therapy
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.stas1-1709
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Wakeman

Abstract

Due to the criminalization of drug use and addiction, opioid use disorder is overrepresented in incarcerated populations. Decades of evidence supports opioid agonist therapy as a highly effective treatment that improves clinical outcomes and reduces illicit opioid use, overdose death, and cost. Opioid agonist therapy has been both studied within correctional facilities and initiated prerelease. It has been found to be beneficial, yet few incarcerated persons receive this evidence-based treatment. In addition to not offering treatment initiation for those who need it, most correctional facilities forcibly withdraw stable patients from opioid agonist therapy upon their entry into the criminal justice system. This approach limits their access to evidence-based health care and results in negative outcomes for individuals, communities, and society.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%