↓ Skip to main content

Different meal, same flavor: cospeciation and host switching of haemosporidian parasites in some non-passerine birds

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different meal, same flavor: cospeciation and host switching of haemosporidian parasites in some non-passerine birds
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Santiago-Alarcon, Adriana Rodríguez-Ferraro, Patricia G Parker, Robert E Ricklefs

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that haemosporidian parasites (Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) and Plasmodium) infecting passerine birds have an evolutionary history of host switching with little cospeciation, in particular at low taxonomic levels (e.g., below the family level), which is suggested as the main speciation mechanism of this group of parasites. Recent studies have characterized diverse clades of haemosporidian parasites (H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus)) infecting non-passerine birds (e.g., Columbiformes, Pelecaniiformes). Here, we explore the cospeciation history of H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) parasites with their non-passerine hosts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
Lithuania 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 49%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,693
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,703
of 243,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#75
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.