↓ Skip to main content

The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
98 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0671-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Z. Hambrick, Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

Abstract

Theories of skilled performance that emphasize training history, such as K. Anders Ericsson and colleagues' deliberate-practice theory, have received a great deal of recent attention in both the scientific literature and the popular press. Twin studies, however, have demonstrated evidence for moderate-to-strong genetic influences on skilled performance. Focusing on musical accomplishment in a sample of over 800 pairs of twins, we found evidence for gene-environment correlation, in the form of a genetic effect on music practice. However, only about one quarter of the genetic effect on music accomplishment was explained by this genetic effect on music practice, suggesting that genetically influenced factors other than practice contribute to individual differences in music accomplishment. We also found evidence for gene-environment interaction, such that genetic effects on music accomplishment were most pronounced among those engaging in music practice, suggesting that genetic potentials for skilled performance are most fully expressed and fostered by practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 27%
Arts and Humanities 13 10%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 37 27%