You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
B-MOBILE - A Smartphone-Based Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Time in Overweight/Obese Individuals: A Within-Subjects Experimental Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0100821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dale S. Bond, J. Graham Thomas, Hollie A. Raynor, Jon Moon, Jared Sieling, Jennifer Trautvetter, Tiffany Leblond, Rena R. Wing |
| Abstract |
Excessive sedentary time (SED) has been linked to obesity and other adverse health outcomes. However, few sedentary-reducing interventions exist and none have utilized smartphones to automate behavioral strategies to decrease SED. We tested a smartphone-based intervention to monitor and decrease SED in overweight/obese individuals, and compared 3 approaches to prompting physical activity (PA) breaks and delivering feedback on SED. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 7 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 311 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 16% |
| Psychology | 46 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 36 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#571,879
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,135
of 194,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,829
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#195
of 4,423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.