You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cell transplantation: case series of 30 subjects with Hereditary Ataxia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-9-65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wan-Zhang Yang, Yun Zhang, Fang Wu, Min Zhang, SC Cho, Chun-Zhen Li, Shao-Hui Li, Guo-Jian Shu, You-Xiang Sheng, Ning Zhao, Ying Tang, Shu Jiang, Shan Jiang, Matthew Gandjian, Thomas E Ichim, Xiang Hu |
Abstract |
The differential diagnosis for hereditary ataxia encompasses a variety of diseases characterized by both autosomal dominant and recessive inheritance. There are no curative treatments available for these neurodegenerative conditions. This open label treatment study used human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cells (CBMC) combined with rehabilitation training as potential disease modulators. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
China | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,637,200
of 23,879,989 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#439
of 4,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,145
of 113,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,879,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.