You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying psychophysiological indices of expert vs. novice performance in deadly force judgment and decision making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00512 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin R. Johnson, Bradly T. Stone, Carrie M. Miranda, Bryan Vila, Lois James, Stephen M. James, Roberto F. Rubio, Chris Berka |
| Abstract |
To demonstrate that psychophysiology may have applications for objective assessment of expertise development in deadly force judgment and decision making (DFJDM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,134,663
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,507
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,363
of 228,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#170
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.