You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of quantitative miRNA expression platforms in the microRNA quality control (miRQC) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pieter Mestdagh, Nicole Hartmann, Lukas Baeriswyl, Ditte Andreasen, Nathalie Bernard, Caifu Chen, David Cheo, Petula D'Andrade, Mike DeMayo, Lucas Dennis, Stefaan Derveaux, Yun Feng, Stephanie Fulmer-Smentek, Bernhard Gerstmayer, Julia Gouffon, Chris Grimley, Eric Lader, Kathy Y Lee, Shujun Luo, Peter Mouritzen, Aishwarya Narayanan, Sunali Patel, Sabine Peiffer, Silvia Rüberg, Gary Schroth, Dave Schuster, Jonathan M Shaffer, Elliot J Shelton, Scott Silveria, Umberto Ulmanella, Vamsi Veeramachaneni, Frank Staedtler, Thomas Peters, Toumy Guettouche, Linda Wong, Jo Vandesompele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Japan | 3 | 12% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 8 | 1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 745 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 208 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 16% |
| Unknown | 99 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 277 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 192 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 76 | 10% |
| Unknown | 121 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#955,045
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,248
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,991
of 245,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#23
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.