↓ Skip to main content

Much at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Much at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis
Published in
Environmental Evidence, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0101-3
Authors

Jacqualyn Eales, Neal R. Haddaway, J. Angus Webb

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 43%
Student > Master 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Environmental Science 3 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,066,076
of 11,902,314 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#53
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,642
of 265,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,902,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.