↓ Skip to main content

Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006033.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laureen M Lopez, David A Grimes, Kenneth F Schulz, Kathryn M. Curtis, Mario Chen

Abstract

Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. Osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 20%
Student > Master 25 15%
Unspecified 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Other 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 53%
Unspecified 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 21 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,320,371
of 13,092,437 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,174
of 10,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,948
of 186,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,092,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.