↓ Skip to main content

Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008057.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biancari F, Tiozzo V, Biancari, Fausto, Tiozzo, Valentina

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) after saphenous vein graft harvesting is a complication occurring in up to 18% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). It is not known whether the method of skin closure influences the infection rate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 167%
Researcher 8 133%
Student > Postgraduate 8 133%
Other 6 100%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 83%
Other 13 217%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 550%
Unspecified 6 100%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 83%
Psychology 3 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Other 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,092,109
of 12,330,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,873
of 8,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,716
of 196,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,330,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.