↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
210 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2011
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.101371
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley L Deeks, Gillian H Lim, Mary Anne Simpson, Louise Gagné, Jonathan Gubbay, Erik Kristjanson, Cecilia Fung, Natasha S Crowcroft

Abstract

This investigation was done to assess vaccine effectiveness of one and two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine during an outbreak of mumps in Ontario. The level of coverage required to reach herd immunity and interrupt community transmission of mumps was also estimated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 210 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Unspecified 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#221,944
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#401
of 9,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#663
of 123,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.