↓ Skip to main content

Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004687.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allan A Abbass, Steve R Kisely, Joel M Town, Falk Leichsenring, Ellen Driessen, Saskia De Maat, Andrew Gerber, Jack Dekker, Sven Rabung, Svitlana Rusalovska, Elizabeth Crowe

Abstract

Since the mid-1970s, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies (STPP) for a broad range of psychological and somatic disorders have been developed and studied. Early published meta-analyses of STPP, using different methods and samples, have yielded conflicting results, although some meta-analyses have consistently supported an empirical basis for STPP. This is an update of a review that was last updated in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 338 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Master 62 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 10%
Other 115 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 165 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 90 25%
Unspecified 40 11%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Other 30 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#860,470
of 12,829,119 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,803
of 10,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,089
of 188,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,829,119 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.