You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Arabidopsis Kinome: phylogeny and evolutionary insights into functional diversification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monika Zulawski, Gunnar Schulze, Rostyslav Braginets, Stefanie Hartmann, Waltraud X Schulze |
| Abstract |
Protein kinases constitute a particularly large protein family in Arabidopsis with important functions in cellular signal transduction networks. At the same time Arabidopsis is a model plant with high frequencies of gene duplications. Here, we have conducted a systematic analysis of the Arabidopsis kinase complement, the kinome, with particular focus on gene duplication events. We matched Arabidopsis proteins to a Hidden-Markov Model of eukaryotic kinases and computed a phylogeny of 942 Arabidopsis protein kinase domains and mapped their origin by gene duplication. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| San Marino | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 46% |
| Scientists | 17 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 27% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,245,729
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#187
of 11,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,873
of 243,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#4
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.